Subscribe

Enter your Email

Blogger

  • Gregg P. Skall

Links

  • WCSR.com
  • Womble Carlyle Political Law Practice
  • Womble Carlyle Blogs

Resources

  • Federal Election Commission
  • NCSL - State Legislation on Ethics Issues
  • NCSL - State Campaign Finance Legislation
  • NCSL - State Election Reform Legislation
  • U.S. Code
  • Code of Federal Regulations
  • Election Law Blog (Professor Rick Hasen)
  • Foreign Agents Registration Search
  • Federal Communications Commission
  • National Institute on Money in State Politics
  • U.S. House of Representatives Ethics Committee
  • U.S.House of Representatives Lobbying Disclosure
  • IRS Political Organization Search
  • Senate Select Committee on Ethics
  • Senate Rules Committee
  • Senate Lobbying Disclosure
  • Open Secrets
  • Political Activity Law
  • StandLouder.com

Client Alerts

  • State and Local Government Contractors Beware: Political Contributions Can Cost You Business
  • Employ Federal Lobbyists? New Civil and Criminal Sanctions Force Fresh Look at Compliance Programs
  • Supreme Court Loosens Restrictions on Ads Companies May Run Before Elections
  • House and Senate Issue Guidance on the New Federal Lobbying and Gift Law
  • New Lobbying Law Deadline Approaches
  • Businesses That Employ Lobbyists Face New Federal Rules, Stiffer Penalties

Previous Posts

  • NAB Political Advertising Webinar - June 30th
  • When Your Anchor Runs for Office
  • DC Circuit Court Rejects Challenge to SEC Pay-to-P...
  • Circuit Court Upholds Federal Contractor Contribut...
  • Foreign National Political Contribution Laws Can C...
  • New Government Contractor Political Contribution D...
  • Individual Contribution Limits Increased for 2015 ...
  • Don't Sweat the Details...Unless You're Filing at ...
  • Supreme Court Opens New Political Contribution Opp...
  • Corporate Political Law Compliance: Top 5 Tips for...

Archives

  • June 2008
  • July 2008
  • August 2008
  • September 2008
  • October 2008
  • November 2008
  • December 2008
  • January 2009
  • February 2009
  • March 2009
  • April 2009
  • May 2009
  • June 2009
  • July 2009
  • August 2009
  • September 2009
  • October 2009
  • November 2009
  • December 2009
  • January 2010
  • February 2010
  • March 2010
  • April 2010
  • June 2010
  • August 2010
  • November 2010
  • January 2011
  • February 2011
  • March 2011
  • May 2011
  • September 2011
  • November 2011
  • February 2012
  • June 2012
  • July 2012
  • September 2012
  • November 2012
  • February 2013
  • March 2013
  • December 2013
  • March 2014
  • April 2014
  • May 2014
  • February 2015
  • April 2015
  • July 2015
  • August 2015
  • June 2016

Powered by Blogger
Add to Technorati Favorites

Wednesday, May 11, 2011, 1:16 PM

White House Proposes Mandatory Disclosure of Political Contributions for Federal Contrators

By The Womble Carlyle Team

A proposed Obama Administration executive order would require all federal contractors to disclose political contributions and expenditures made by their principals and related entities during the two years prior to submitting a bid.

As a condition for receiving an award, contractors would be required to disclose the following contributions, if the annual aggregate amount of such contributions exceeds $5,000 to a given recipient:

Contributions made to federal candidates or political parties by the bidding entity, its directors or officers, or any affiliates or subsidiaries within its control; and

Contributions made to third party entities with the intention or reasonable expectation that the contributions will be used to make independent expenditures or electioneering communications

A growing number of states and localities have “pay-to-play” laws that compel disclosure by bidders and contractors, and even restrict or prohibit contributions by certain individuals and entities associated with the bidder or contractor. But in states and municipalities where disclosure is required, it is generally limited to direct contributions from corporate officials and PACs (political action committees). The draft executive order goes farther by requiring federal contractors to investigate whether contributions to trade associations and other groups will be used in connection with federal elections. If such use is intended, the contractor will have to weigh whether making the contribution could give an appearance of undue influence, thus jeopardizing a future bid.

It is important to note that the Administration’s draft order only addresses disclosure. It does not restrict or prohibit any political contributions. Under current law, federal contractors may not make political contributions, but their PACs individual owners, officers, and employees are free to make contributions subject to generally applicable limits.

Several important issues remain to be worked out through implementing regulations. For example, since contract award is conditioned on the disclosure of political contributions, it is not clear what sanctions, if any, may result from errors or omissions discovered after contract performance has commenced. In addition, while the order is not intended to create any right enforceable against the federal government, the order would seem to allow a contract bidder to try to oust a competing bidder based on an inaccurate or incomplete disclosure.

As currently drafted, the new requirements will apply to contracts resulting from solicitations issued on or after the effective date of implementing rules, which must be issued by the Federal Acquisition Regulatory (FAR) Council by the end of the year.

E-mail Print
White House Proposes Mandatory Disclosure of Political Contributions for Federal Contrators
Bookmark and Share
back to top
Copyright © 2004-2017 Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Site Map